When I get asked to review papers submitted to scientific (typically medical) journals, I often see the same problems cropping up. Yet, I know it’s really hard for researchers to find friendly statisticians to help them strengthen their studies. So, I have just started a log of all my peer reviews. They are sketchy so they remain unidentifiable and anonymised, but hopefully by listing the objections I had to the paper, I can help future authors avoid the same pitfalls. You can access it from the tab at the top of all my blog pages.
Published by Robert